Interstitial Cystitis. Bladder Pain Syndrome. IC/BPS
Interstitial Cystitis (IC) also known as Bladder Pain Syndrome (BPS) is a chronic inflammatory condition of the submucosal and muscular layers of the bladder.IC/BPS may be associated with urinary urgency, frequency and waking at night to urinate (nocturia.)
As a German New Medicine consultant we understand the biological conflict responsible for Interstitial Cystitis (IC) is a boundary demarcation. Someone has “crossed the line.” Unable to demarcate ones boundaries, establish one’s boundaries, ones territory, in woman – unable to take a stand, draw a line in the sand, put your foot down. Someone encroaching on your private space, territory.
In German New Medicine, the use of the term conflict is very different from that of its use in psychology. In GNM, a biological conflict is a Catch-22 of the psyche. A trauma, shock or dilemma which the individual must overcome in order to insure it’s biological integrity or survival. The Catch-22 lies in the fact that the biological conflict cannot, at least at that moment in time be resolved. A stalemate of sorts ensues, but like any good stalemate something has to give, so nature intercedes to take the ‘weight’ of the distress off of the psyche and shift it to the organ.
The ‘weight’ is translated into a compensatory emergency biological program that expresses on the cellular level that the body is able to run or process over time. With interstitial cystitis – the program expresses itself within the submucosal and muscular layers of the bladder. This is nature’s way of shifting the “weight” from the psyche to the organ level as the translation buys time for the possibility of a conflict resolution.
What standard medicine calls a cystitis, is in reality a meaningful adaptive program created to assist us in resolving a difficult biological demarcation catch-22. During the conflict active phase of the biological conflict, ulcerations will occur in order to widen the bladder (no symptoms) – the biological meaning is to enlarge the inside of the bladder to hold more urine so one can have sufficient urine to ‘mark’ one’s territory or boundary.
Frequent urination will be evident during the conflict active phase, no pain or discomfort. The biological meaning (5th law of GNM) is found in the conflict active phase – to enlarge the inside of the bladder to hold more urine. Once the conflict is resolved there will be bladder infections – painful swelling, bleeding, irritation, and spasms of the bladder musculature (EC.) We need to look at when this first began and what placed it into resolution.
We also need to look at tracks at this point. Tracks are conscious and subconscious stimuli that will reopen the original biological conflict preventing a completion of the biological program and a complete healing – turning this into a chronic condition. Every time the nature of the conflict is re-experienced, it will express through the program opening up again and trigger a cystitis.
Whenever we are dealing with cystitis we also need to look to see if the bladder musculature is involved. The biological conflict associated with the musculature is a self devaluation (SDC) relative to one’s INABILITY – to the above conflict, affecting the striated musculature of the bladder wall. During the conflict active phase of this SDC biological conflict, a necrosis of the striated musculature of the bladder wall will occur with a relaxation of the sphincter. Once the conflict is resolved, the bladder necrosis heals and the bladder muscle relaxes – albeit with scarring.
This is the conflict responsible for the scarring, hardening and lack of ability of the bladder to stretch, sometimes resulting in end stage bladder. We need to stop any further damage asap. The most hopeful outcome is if and when the individual can resolve the conflict very early on and address all tracks.
being ‘PISSED OFF’ at continually having to back off, back down, having one’s territory invaded…
A bit more information would be needed.
So, I am left with foul smelling urine. The frequent urination and burning has subsided but I’m unable to figure out what is causing the lingering symptoms mentioned above. Any help would be appreciated.
I had IC for a few years and then was advised to take quercetin which stopped all symptoms… something I was intensely grateful for as I was completely miserable. It seems to have returned presently….six years later and quercetin is helping but I feel other things also going on now and it’s time to get to the bottom of it….I’m confused where/how to start though. Your advice is greatly appreciated thanks.
I see a ‘scapegoat’ syndrome as a means of maintaining a systemic order (or consciousness) as part of an unwillingness or unreadiness to own, face or resolve the conflict of split allegiances.
So I see the ‘world’ we generate by masking in ‘controls and supportive or compliant accommodations or appeasements’ as a projection of a masking distortion set over underlying functions.
That our ‘problems are already solved’ is then held in trust as an integrality of being that a mind at war with itself cannot replicate, predictively define or control – but can and does persist in such a ‘war’ in the ‘defences or countermeasures that encapsulate and thus protect the conflict – by ‘putting it OUT to the othered – where it cannot Be resolved because it is not there!
Decision arising from the heart of a true discernment is the ‘gift of Spirit’ rather than a prepackaging of manufactured ‘thinking’ that masks in the image or form of true function but does not whole or heal – but can be clung to as the ‘little that ye hath’ – in terms of support in the world that we ‘know’ or have adapted and identified as real for us.
Running off with a false or forced inheritance is the underlying split of a mind phished by its own self-imaged concept.
But never did the split actually occur in the Mind of the Creator – and so reality is not lost so much as lost sight of – while struggling to regain or retain possession under fear of pain of loss – given permission to run as a mitigating displacement script – that buys time – but can then become ‘trapped’ in time.
The living now is of being – not of thinking. But thinking shapes perception and response and so needs to be brought TO a truly present awareness rather than shape what can be allowed into awareness.
The idea of boundary has been used to separate – or mask and distance as a basis for countermeasure – but boundary in truth is communication within living. It is this fluid balancing of ‘Self/Otherself’ that can become lost to structures of ‘control’ that become a development of consciousness running blind. It is that which is called to the light – not to be damned – but healed or redeemed to forms of a loving integrality of being – in place of structured ‘correctness’s’ that persist (and seek to take joy in) the evils or ills that justify its ‘war on’ whatever.
Substitutions for love or joy in being are NOT truly fulfilling and yet can undermine or block a true fulfillment or gratitude for being.
Who would fix the body so as to leave a mind unchanged does not know what they do – but is no less worthy of love’s awareness now – and so we can only join with where someone is – and not where we think or wish they be.
The a-tempt to fix ourselves in others is also part of an unhealed healer – that we can become responsible relative to by noticing it as a willingness to choose not to use it.
I write in complimentary support for understanding or embracing life-shocks as part of challenge, adaptation and creative growth or unfoldment of consciousness instead of running as survival scripts or tracks of fear, threat and attack that no longer serve who we are now. The shift from scattered and fragmented thinking to presence of being is decision that we can recognize and rest in as unforced – despite a storm of symptoms.
That I seek to articulate is not food for the mind but for the recognition of the heart to which the mind is rightly in service. What can the mind do when the heart’s allegiance is split? But step in to ‘save the heart’ by projecting the split ‘away’.
Thanks for witnessing to and sharing in a greater perspective than pathological looping!
I read the on off switch page – and want to comment to the assumption that Dr Hamer couldn’t ‘have another baby’ to resolve the loss of his son.
But he did – in terms of creative renewal – and that is the gift of ‘new medicine’.
The symbolic expression of an implicate order to the particulars of our our lives is fundamentally of a love that can not BE defined or represented in image or symbol – but which the mind of an embodied perception does be-live real or truly share in the experience of.
My sense of evolution is the unfolding of a whole – not a progressive historical imprinting structure.
I don’t see a real division between evolution and creation but that the insistence in a non-psychic Cause is itself a symptom of separation trauma running ‘blind’.
When our love dies or is killed, denied, and persecuted, we are liable to ‘die’ with it.
But love is not IN the script or picture of a-grievance.
I’ll quote a line from a song:
“For his true love has flown into every flower grown, and he must be keeper of the garden”
(Crazy Man Michael – Fairport Convention).
Only by loving do we re-cognize who and what we are.
I speak not to virtue signalling!!